TOKYO Minutes after North Korea launched its rocket, South Korea’s navy detected a rain of fragments falling into the sea and then a sooner-than-expected disappearance of the rocket from their radar, suggesting a possible failure. News outlets working in real time jumped on the idea. But it quickly proved wrong.
South Korean officials and foreign analysts say they now believe the first stage of the rocket had a cagey new feature: It was deliberately rigged to blow up after separation Sunday, for the express purpose of confounding foreign analysts.
While government leaders around the world are trying to figure out how to punish North Korea for its rocket launch, the U.S., Japanese and South Korean militaries are scouring the seas for debris and analysts are studying photos, trajectories ‚Äî anything that might provide insight into North Korean rocketry skills.
So far they haven’t found much, in part because the first stage was destroyed.
In a statement Tuesday, South Korea’s Defence Ministry said it believes the North deliberately blew up the rocket’s first stage after burnout to prevent South Korea from retrieving rocket debris.
Previously, South Korea retrieved the first stage of the rocket the North launched in 2012, along with a 5-by-30-centimetre (2-by-12-inch) explosive device they say suggests the North had intended to blow that one up, too.
From North Korea’s perspective, blowing up some of the evidence makes sense.
“If I were North Korea, I would probably have done the same thing to avoid South Korea pulling it out of the sea to study it and show it off,” said David Wright, co-director of the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. “The second stage lands far enough out at sea that it is probably not recoverable, so they wouldn’t need to worry so much about that.”
The move could also have deeper military implications. Governments around the world have denounced the launch as a cover for testing long-range ballistic missile technology, which it is banned from doing under U.N. resolutions.
Ted Postol, a rocket expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said that if the North deliberately blew up the rocket’s first stage, it could complicate weapons defences being developed by the United States.
“If it is true that the first stage was intentionally cut into many pieces, it is a clear indication that the North Koreans have also demonstrated the potential to build countermeasures against U.S. missile defences,” he said.
He said such defences rely heavily on infrared tracking. But previous tests by the U.S. of its anti-missile defence systems indicate that a plethora of false targets ‚Äî like the fragments of a detonated rocket stage ‚Äî make it difficult for interceptors using infrared homing devices to distinguish the warhead from pieces of debris.
The reports of a failure began almost as soon as the rocket was off the Sohae launch pad on North Korea’s west coast.
Soon after the first stage was detached from the rocket, radar on a South Korean Aegis destroyer at sea picked up 270 fragments falling into the waters off the Korean Peninsula’s west coast. Combined with reports from officials in Seoul that they had lost contact with the rocket sooner than they had expected to, the data seemed to point to a failed launch.
The theory was short-lived, since it soon became clear the satellite was in orbit.
Of course, not all the debris can be destroyed.
South Korea says it has already retrieved what it believes is the rocket’s fairing ‚Äî a casing that protects its payload ‚Äî in the waters southwest of the southern Jeju island.
Its defence ministry said the rocket’s second stage was believed to have landed in the waters east of the Philippines’ Luzon island, about 2,380 kilometres (1,500 miles) away from the North’s launch pad. The ministry said South Korea and the United States are still trying to find its exact splash zone.
Questions remained Tuesday over whether the new satellite was functioning properly.
Though in orbit, no signals from it had been confirmed, which could suggest it was “tumbling” and not stable enough to transmit data back to its controllers and fulfil its official mission as an Earth observation satellite.
That was the same fate that befell North Korea’s 2012 satellite, the Kwangmyongsong 3-2. It is also still in orbit but spiraling back to Earth and is not believed to have transmitted signals back to Earth.
Both satellites bear the name “Shining Star,” a reference to Kim Jong Un’s father, the late Kim Jong Il. The new satellite, which is thought to be somewhat larger than the earlier one, is called Kwangmyongsong 4.
The Shining Star name was also written on the rocket itself, which previously carried the name Unha, or “Galaxy.”