VANCOUVER—A woman who found a black bear cub that later was killed by a conservation officer is accusing the British Columbia government of breaking its own law on the destruction of wild animals.
Tiana Jackson and the Association for the Protection of Fur-Bearing Animals have filed a court petition challenging the officer's decision to kill the cub near Dawson Creek in May, 2016.
They argue the Wildlife Act prohibits officers from killing animals unless they pose a threat to people, property, or wildlife.
The province counters in court documents that the law gives wide discretion to officers to destroy animals.
“The province says there are no legal limits on the ability of conservation officers to kill animals,” Arden Beddoes, a lawyer representing Jackson and the advocacy group, said outside court yesterday.
“What we say is that . . . the Wildlife Act actually directs that there are limits,” he noted.
“If they're not a threat, the officer, we say, does not have authority to kill the animal.”
Jackson found the apparently-orphaned bear cub, which was about the size of a domestic cat, by the side of the road on May 6, 2016, the petitioners say in court documents.
She called RCMP, which contacted the conservation officer service.
In the meantime, she and others caught the bear and brought it back to a dog pen on her property to keep it safe, the documents say.
They say Jackson received a call from conservation officer Micah Kneller, who told her he would come and kill the bear—even though she told him a wildlife rehabilitation centre was willing to take the cub.
“She was very upset,” Beddoes told a B.C. Supreme Court judge at the start of a two-day hearing yesterday.
The petitioners are seeking an order directing the province to obey the law as they interpret it.
They also want a declaration that Kneller's decision to kill the cub was unlawful.
The province argues in court documents that the law gives officers the authority to destroy animals as they deem necessary.
It points to a section of the Wildlife Act that says the offences outlined in the act do not apply to an “officer engaged in the performance of his or her duties.”
The act “implicitly anticipates that conservation officers may need to euthanize wounded wildlife or wildlife that cannot otherwise survive in the wild,” the province says in the documents.
It also says there would be no point in quashing the decision made by Kneller some 18 months after the bear was killed, and asks the judge to dismiss that part of the case.
The province says Kneller made the decision because he didn't consider the cub to be a suitable candidate for captive rearing and release.
Beddoes told the judge the petitioners accept that some wild animals must be killed because they are sick, injured, or otherwise unlikely to survive.
But they say a different provincial law, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, states the animal should be evaluated by a wildlife professional, such as a veterinarian.
“That act wasn't complied with here,” Beddoes said outside court.