(CP)
Thursday, March 27, 2008

OTTAWA—The RCMP, stung by criticism over secrecy, is rethinking its decision to strip Taser reports of crucial information after the public safety minister demanded a second look.
In a statement late yesterday, Commissioner William Elliott said he had ordered “a further review” of recently-released copies of forms detailing use of the electronic weapons “to determine if additional information” should be released.

“It is anticipated that this review can be completed within two weeks.”
A spokesman for Public Safety minister Stockwell Day said the minister “has asked for and received assurances from the commissioner that the RCMP will further review the matter.”
The RCMP announcement came just hours after the police force said it stood by a decision to withhold details of Taser firings, including whether the suspect was armed and any injuries caused by the stun gun.
Sgt. Sylvie Tremblay said the Mounties had released “all the information that could be provided” under the Access to Information Act when it disclosed newly-reclassified and heavily-censored records last week.
“The RCMP is committed to respecting the public’s right to know while upholding the law and protecting the privacy rights of individuals,” Tremblay said in an interview.
“Requesters may challenge the RCMP’s application of various exemptions . . . should they be dissatisfied with the processing of their request.”
Critics said that’s a lame excuse for shielding details that once were routinely disclosed.
A joint investigation by The Canadian Press and CBC found the Mounties are now censoring key elements that must be recorded each time officers draw their electronic weapons.
The force no longer reveals whether Tasered people were armed or not, the precise dates of firings, and whether the device caused any burns, cuts, or bruises.
As a result, Canadians know much less about who is being hit with the contentious 50,000-volt guns and under what circumstances.
Advocates of more openness point out the names and addresses of Tasered people already are struck from the forms, making further deletions unnecessary.
“The leadership of the RCMP appears to have a tin ear for what the public wants in relation to Taser use,” said Frank Addario, president of the Criminal Lawyers’ Association.
“It seems obvious that the public wants transparency in relation to the training and circumstances in which this . . . device is used, limitations on its use after any apparent threat to public or officer safety is managed and, above all, thorough training of police officers in advance of using these devices.”
Another RCMP spokesman, Troy Lightfoot, has said internal analysis of Taser reports concluded the painful weapons were being used correctly.
Opposition critics and newspaper editorials say that amounts to a “just-trust-us” approach.
Opposition MPs on an all-party Commons committee studying Tasers say the force must be held to account.
“I think the RCMP, by doing this, is losing a lot of credibility on the way they handle the Taser,” said Bloc Quebecois MP Serge Menard. “It makes us more suspicious.
“One thing is for sure, we’re going to examine the documents that you’ve got and we’ll see if we can get some more ourselves.”
A Canadian Press analysis last November of 563 cases between 2002 and 2005 found three in four suspects Tasered by the RCMP were unarmed.
Several of those reports suggested a pattern of stun-gun use as a convenient means of keeping drunk or rowdy people in line, rather than to defuse major clashes.
Nineteen people in Canada have died soon after being Tasered.
Manufacturer Taser International stresses that its device has never been directly blamed for a death, although it has been cited as a contributing factor in several cases.